Torque is the main factor, proboly both cams make around 360 hp. A common mistake is to assume that the camshaft choice should come first, and then the engine should be built around that. There is no popping in at wide open throttle. To get the most out of a cam, choose it last. They may run like a scalded dog at high-rpm levels, but they can also be miserable to live with on the street. The problem with all-out race cams is they’re designed expressly for one purpose. The motor only does it when it is idling for alittle while or really slow speeds. The Target Thumpr cams are designed to deliver the rough, racy exhaust note associated with big, carbureted race engines but retain their street manners. I am having problems with the motor popping through the exhaust. What kind of power differance would the Isky be over the GM. I am slowly working the bugs out of a new cam and head swap.

The car is a 1990 Third gen Camaro with a Small Block Chevy 350 with. It is going in my 80 Camaro, (396) TH350(trans-go shift kit),3000 TCI stall 3.73's, 255-60-15 tires out back, 3' exhaust w/H-pipe and 40 series delta race flows, 2' primary headers( I know its to big of a system for a stock engine, but it looks Bad-Ass). Today I'm comparing the sound difference between two Comp Camshafts.

I am looking for driveability and reliability out of this enging. I was thinking of swaping that for a Isky 270 mega, but was wondering if a GM performance cam be better. Now it has a Lunati cam that is almost the same specs as the Eddie Torker, just 114 centerline.

Chevy 350 cam sounds